Abstract
Be not deceived by the title. Fuller is neither an "objective" reporter on the fortunes of the intelligent design (ID) movement nor does he attempt in this book to weigh the pros and cons of ID. Rather, he writes as one convinced that Darwinism and Neo-Darwinism are no more than "rhetorical achievements" that will wither in the twenty-first century as did Marxism in the twentieth. In seeking to "balance the ledger between evolution and ID" (p. 7), the book's five chapters discuss the "problem of evolution" historically, ideologically, and in terms of complexity theory, the legal issues, and "Life after Darwinism."