Abstract
Let me begin by noting points of agreement and my admiration for Roy Clouser's project. "Prospects for Theistic Science" strikes me as correct in the main. I agree that no theory, scientific or otherwise, can escape having religious presuppositions. This extremely important point merits far more attention than it has yet received in the literature. I also concur with his definition of religious belief. I know of none more accurate or comprehensive. Going beyond noting points of agreement, however, this response will point to some key areas where Clouser's stance on religious neutrality deserves further discussion and clarification.