Abstract
Andrew Kulikovsky's article 'Scripture and general revelation' (Journal of Creation 19:2, 2005) argued that Scripture alone must inform us what to make of the scientific evidence for the age of the earth. That is to say, apropos origins and dating, the Scriptures are the filtering backdrop that scientific discoveries must be cast through. Although Andrew doesn't say as such, his is an address of the philosophical chestnut of presuppositionalism versus evidentialism, with Andrew firmly squaring off against the latter.